Tuesday 19 June 2012

Silence on a Bus



A silent bus journey leads me to wonder about the current and future state of our 'personal-bubble' society. (If that doesn't capture your interest, I don't know what will...)



To escape the extraneous fees of inner city parking today, I parked and rode, forsaking control of the remainder of my journey for the cost of £1.80. On my return journey out of town, there were just three people in our big, blue bus, including myself and the bus driver. So I put on my (mental) anthropologically-tinted glasses, and saw the situation thus:

1.       The bus driver was (thankfully) seated behind the wheel at the front of the bus, I half-a-bus-length back from him and an older woman was further back still.

2.       Being in England, the bus driver was seated on the right-hand side of the bus. I was on the left, and the other woman, on the right.

3.       I was equidistant from the two other people on the bus and had no way of making eye contact with either of them, short of turning in my seat to look behind me.

And this was fine. Good, actually, because it gave each of us the perfect reasoning not to talk to the others; it would be physically awkward to twist in our seats or to shout. However, as we ambled on in our three silences, I started to find the quiet unnerving. Maybe it was just me.


But it occurred to me to think that perhaps the physical awkwardness of communication between us was actually just a cover-up for the very real social awkwardness we would feel if one of us were to break our silence (there are occasions on buses when stranger-talk is acceptable, of course, but they follow strict rules and will be discussed elsewhere…). I began to wonder just what would happen if I were to turn in my seat and start discussing the weather, a reasonably safe topic for stranger-talk, with the woman behind me, or, more drastically, get up from my seat and actually be audacious enough to sit next to her, to more easily facilitate such a discussion.

The more I thought of this, the more the idea repelled me. It was like an invisible barrier, a subconscious shaking of the head in response to this outlandish action. I couldn’t imagine me sitting next to that woman and starting a conversation; what on earth would she think?


She might answer my questions politely enough, though sooner or later we would undoubtedly lapse into silence again. She might be thrilled about talking to someone and breaking the monotony of an otherwise dull bus ride. She might, however, be totally repelled by this blatant breach of social norms, by which strangers stay strangers, don’t talk on buses and don’t intrude into other passengers’ personal space. Due to cultural conventions, though, even if this were her internal reaction, it is likely that she would have carried out option number one, while the centre in her brain titled ‘cultural norms’ was going into overdrive. This seems, from all angles, the most likely, and I have reached this conclusion by imagining myself in her position; I would definitely be thrown off by random conversation with random people, on a bus which I’ve only caught so as to reach the social safety of my car and become anonymous and confined once again.

Oh dear. Maybe it’s because I’m of a younger generation, where over-the-garden-fence chats have been replaced by networking sites and face-to-face communication by text-messaging, and the message ‘don’t talk to strangers’ has been tattooed on the inside of my eyeballs (along with all the capitals of the world and the square root of pi, obviously). Believe me, it would take a lot to remove that invisible, social restraint from my mind (seems like a ‘mind forg’d manacles’ moment to me. A-thank you, Mr Blake…) so that I could initiate a conversation on a bus, and I don’t think it will happen anytime soon.


And I find this a great shame. What kind of future will we have, if we are all alienated from each other, unable to talk with people outside of 'controlled' environments such as the workplace or schools? It seems to me that this is the perfect breeding ground for distrust of others and therefore the use of only stereotypes and prejudices to guide our judgements of other human beings; by which other means would we judge?

So, if you are of the older generations, talk to the younger, before we forget how to. If you are of the younger generations, just talk. Maybe that should be my challenge for the week; start a conversation on a bus and thereby take the first step in circumventing a bleak and bitter future. Yeah, right…

Monday 28 May 2012

The Afghan Girl


In 1984, photographer Steve McCurry took a picture which changed the perception of Afghan refugees, highlighted the plights of men and women in a country wracked by war and became a symbol of resilience and strength. You may have seen it before:
^ Sharbat Gula as a girl in 1984. This picture was to feature on
the front cover of National Geographic in 1985.
The first thing which must strike you when looking at this picture is the piercing stare of those startling eyes. This picture was taken by Steve McCurry, who found the girl in a refugee camp, noticing her as shy and quiet. He says that, at the time, he had no idea that he had just taken a picture which was to become an icon of the resilience of Afghan refugees.
Years after this picture was taken, a team went to Afghanistan to find this girl, and to photograph her as a women. They had no idea how to find her or if she was even still alive. When shown this picture, one man said he knew her brother, and managed to find him and his sister for the team. Upon sighting her in 2003, McCurry knew he had found the girl. Now a woman, there was no mistaking the set of the face and those eyes. Her name is Sharbat Gula.
When found, Sharbat had 3 daughters, the fourth having died in infancy, was married and had gone into purdah, the isolated state in which many Muslim woman enter, hiding their faces from the public eye. She agreed, however, to show her face to be photographed for the second time in her life:
^ Sharbat says she has never known
a happy day in her life.
Facial features, including a mole on her forehead, and iris recognition technology have identified this woman as the 'Afghan Girl'. Now that she has been 'found', Sharbat's story has invoked the National Geographic to take action to protect Afghan woman and children in their own country.









To read Sharbat's story:

Easter Island Monoliths


The humanoid heads of Easter Island, or moai, are thought to represent the deceased heads of lineages on the Island and may have taken half a dozen men a year to complete. Last year (2011), a message reached the world which changed the public's perception of these monoliths: the heads have bodies.
^ These statues are made from condensed volcanic ash,
or tuff, and were carved using only stone hand chisels
Volcanic ash from the extinct volcano Rano Raraku solidified and compressed to form tuff, a maleable rock. This tuff would have been repeatedly wetted and sculpted for as long as a year to make these incredible moai. The results of this back-breaking work were then transported around the island and positioned on stone platforms called ahu at the edges of the island, so that the faces looked over their clan's land.

The sheer time and effort it took for men to build and then transport these monoliths (see image) around their island is immense, and pays tribute to the dedication seen in almost all cultures around the world that man seems to have for his ancestors.

The most beautiful of these statues were extensively photographed and became the image which springs to mind upon the hearing of 'Easter Island'. However, over 500 years of erosion buried these iconic monoliths to their chins and so the word that the 'heads' have bodies amazed the world. In actuality, this fact has been known to archaeologists since around 1914, who studied intact monoliths inside the tuff quarry, even naming the largest of them 'Paro', which boasts a 33ft height and 82 tonne weight.

The real news regarding these immense works of ancient art is the study of the carvings, preserved by their burial, on the bodies, which are to be documented for the first time this year (2012).

For more information on the Easter Island monoliths:

http://www.livescience.com/20580-easter-island-heads-bodies.html
(information on the 'discovery' of monolithic bodies)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moai
(general reading)